Criminal
The criminal was a woman. They are always women.
On paper, the sentence is imprisonment, up to six years. In the dank back rooms of Manila slums, and in the emergency wards of public hospitals, the sentence can be death. In 2008, at least 500,000 women resorted to abortion. Ninety thousand suffered complications. A thousand died.
In the Republic of the Philippines abortion is illegal. There are no exceptions under the law. It does not matter if the woman’s life is at stake on an operating table in the Fabella General Hospital. It does not matter if the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, if the expectant mother is a 9-year-old girl in the slums of Tondo, if the fetus is expected to die within the womb and the woman with it.
That the penalty of abortion is often death is not a secret from these women. They know this. They’ve seen it happen. Women who risk death are not concerned with the legality of their actions, they are willing to push the twisted end of a plastic hanger into their uteruses; they believe they have no other choice. They may be afraid of God or death or the arm of the law, but they will carry on. The criminal penalty meant to stop abortion has not stopped millions of women; it has only stopped them from seeking help when they are bleeding into the cheap wood floors of their makeshift homes. Criminalization has pushed them into the streets of Quiapo, outside the Church of the Black Nazarene, where the voices of priests echo in prayer and tablets of Cytotec are sold six for a thousand alongside plaster statues of the Virgin Mary.
Her name is Maricel, she was 18 and already a mother. That year she was granted a visa to work as a domestic worker overseas. And then she discovered she was pregnant. She induced her own abortion for fear of losing her chance to support her family. She failed, and went to a woman who inserted catheters into her uterus. It took two weeks of infection and vaginal bleeding for Maricel to decide to go to the hospital “because she was scared.” Her story ended on the operating table. The doctors said she died of septic shock.
The Republic of the Philippines is one of the last countries in the world that continue to call every instance of termination of pregnancy a criminal act, and because it is, every woman who commits abortion commits it on her own. The Philippines has one of the highest numbers of maternal deaths in the West Pacific Region, 230 dying out of 100,000 live births, as opposed to the regional average of 82. Unsafe abortion is responsible for up to 20 percent of these deaths.
Her name is Josie, 26. She went to an abortionist, pressed down on her abdomen and thrust a fat hose up her vagina. She was in the clinic a long time. She bled. Some of the blood stank. There was blood on the bedpan, on the sheets, gushing in chunks. The blood was very red. At home, she bled for more than a week. In chunks, in gushes. She thought she would die.
Those who condemn these women point to their culpability. Whores and sluts, murderers, should have kept their legs closed if they didn’t want a child. Should have abstained. Should have been good, responsible women, should be good mothers, should take responsibility. That most of these criminal women are Catholic, married, uneducated and desperately poor does not matter to many of their critics from Church and laity. Opponents of the Reproductive Health Bill say they oppose the provision of free contraception because to permit it may lead to permitting abortion and in one stroke denied thousands of women freedom from abortion.
This is Ana from Manila, mother of eight, who induced an abortion after her ninth child. She said she could not use family planning, because it was unavailable. A Guttmacher study says that in Manila, where an executive order was issued banning contraception in public health centers, the incidence of abortion is higher than in any other part of the country. A national government that makes contraception impossible for 90 percent of the population has no right to echo an impossible morality. They call these women criminals—the same government whose buckling under the Catholic lobby in the issue of reproductive health has forced millions of women to face the option of abortion.
This is Aileen, a mother of five, three of whom were still babies. She risked an unsafe abortion when she found out she was pregnant with her sixth.
“Only those who are better off, rich, can talk about abortion as illegal. They have no worries about raising their children… They do not know what it is like to be poor and desperate… Poor women have limited options… Everything I did was for my living children.”
This is the sort of woman they call a bad mother, a criminal who deserves to bleed to death in the corners of hospital rooms. The stigma of abortion coming from its criminalization means that when women who suffer after unsafe abortions find the courage to go to a hospital, medical staff believe they have the right to discriminate against such women. There is no such thing as patient confidentiality; there is no such thing as priority for those who are dying in gushes. The Jason Ivlers of the world can get their confidentiality and medical care after a shootout with the police, but in this country, the bleeding woman is the exception to the Hippocratic Oath.
This is Imelda, 30 years old. She was bleeding when she arrived in the Fabella Hospital. The doctors shouted at her. They said they would call the police. They said they would not allow her to leave the hospital if they discovered she had an abortion. She was allowed to bleed without care for four hours, and was interrogated by nine different health workers while she bled.
This is Lisa, and in Gat Andres Bonifacio Memorial Medical Center, they told her she would be arrested if they proved she had aborted. They made her sign a document in English, a language she could not understand on paper. A nurse put a notebook-size sign at the bottom of her bed with the word “abortion.” There was no chart with her name, only that one word.
This is Gina, and when the staff of Tondo General discovered she had aborted, she was left alone. Her back was soaked in blood. She wished someone would give her a napkin, a diaper, anything. Nobody did.
This is written in support of the decriminalization of abortion, in the hope that safe abortion will be offered for women in cases of rape and incest and risk to life, that women will no longer be ignored in emergency rooms because of who they are, that contraception will be provided so that no woman will be forced to see abortion as a choice, and that the thousands who choose the risk of back alleys and coat hangers will be called victims instead of criminals.
Call it by its name: abortion. In this country, every woman who chooses abortion is a criminal, and the sentence is often death and pain. One thousand women died bleeding in 2008, nobody was held accountable, because for some, these women deserved to die. The state holds them down; the Church watches them bleed. The criminals are not always women. The crimes are not always theirs.
They pray, these women. They believe in God, and some of them believe that God is forgiving. Today, at least three women will die, because they have no reason to have the same faith in their fellow men as they do in God.
Sep 5, 2010
Dear Ms. Evangelista.
I don’t believe that distributing contraception is a solution for abortion. Several studies in different countries with broad access to contraception indicate that at least 50% of abortions happen after (failed) use of contraception. In my country, Belgium, we’ve had full scale promotion of contraception for decades and the number of abortions has increased each year, especially among teenagers (not to mention that the number of divorces has increased as well and a lot).
The evolution in the United Kingdom is a devastating example of the results of large scale government programs promoting reproductive health and sex education in accordance with so-called modern/Western values. For example, the last UK government spent £300 million on its Teenage Pregnancy Strategy, with the declared aim of halving pregnancies among under-18s by this year. According to the Office for National Statistics, the pregnancy rate among teenagers aged 15 to 17 when Labour came to power was 45 conceptions per 1,000; a decade on, it had barely changed. Figures published 24 August 2010 indicate that the rate has recently risen sharply, particularly among those under 16. Along with statistics from the Health Protection Agency, which recorded almost half a million new cases of sexually transmitted diseases in 2009, mostly among the young, the data confirm this country’s unassailable position as Europe’s trailblazer in sexual irresponsibility. This is a failure of policy on an epic scale, the result of a 13-year social experiment that has proved an unmitigated disaster. What’s worse is that the UK has vowed to promote it’s failures into the developing world!
In contrast with artificial contraception, natural family planning costs virtually nothing, has no side effects (such as from hormonal pills) and has proven to be a beneficial factor in relationships. It is also nearly as efficient as the best artificial methods. Artificial contraception on the other side has the big disadvantage for women that men get the impression that they are always available.
Men should be educated to respect women, to respect their feelings, to take their responsibility when a woman becomes pregnant. This is a vital issue which I never see mentioned in articles which promote things like safe abortion, access to contraception. From my experience I can tell that most women do not abort when they have the support of their partner.
Legalizing abortion in case of rape or incest, implies that you legalize that the value of human life depends on the circumstances. This means the abolition of the equality between all people. Instead of legalizing abortion the focus should be put on protecting life of both the mother and the foetus. If the life of the mother is threatened, everything should be done to protect her life as well as that of the foetus, instead of immediately suggesting to terminate the life of the baby. Please note that the death of a foetus as the result of an act to protect the health of the mother, when it is seriously threatened, is NOT condemned by the official teaching of the catholic church when care is provided to try and save the life of the foetus as well.
It is also important to note that legalizing abortion is not a factor in decreasing maternal deaths. The Lancet published a study in April 2010 that refuted UN data which promoted family planning and abortion as ways to decrease maternal mortality. The new study did not mention family planning, instead finding that skilled birth attendants, emergency obstetric care, improved education and economic circumstances, along with declining birth rates, were responsible for a drop in global maternal deaths from more than 500,000 in 1980 to 342,900 in 2008.
Dear Ms. Evangelista, I pray that Philippines doesn’t make the same mistakes as Western countries which have seen a huge rise in family breakdown after they massively started to throw away christian values in favor of sexual liberation in which abortion and contraception are the means to deal with the consequences. There’s no doubt that something needs to be done about the fact that women look for abortion because of their unbearable situations, but promoting safe abortion and artificial contraception is going to make matters worse. Instead I believe efforts should be put in supporting women with unwanted pregnancies (for 10 years, I am envolved myself in an organisation which helps women keep their babies without putting pressure on them), educating men to respect women, dealing with poverty in general and if all else fails supporting the possibility for adoption (my own best friend was an unwanted child conceived after adultery and raised by adoptive parents).
Sincerely
Dirk Baeten
Belgium